Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The name "xprint-xorg" may be slighly misleading since it is not based
> > on the plain X.org source; I am using a tree based on the X.org tarballs
> > with tons of my own patches to get the little monster working...
> >
> > What about "xprint-xprintorg" ? :)
> >
>
> OK, w
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The name "xprint-xorg" may be slighly misleading since it is not based
> > on the plain X.org source; I am using a tree based on the X.org tarballs
> > with tons of my own patches to get the little monster working...
> >
> > What about "xprint-xprintorg" ? :)
> >
>
> OK,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:54:06AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> The name "xprint-xorg" may be slighly misleading since it is not based
> on the plain X.org source; I am using a tree based on the X.org tarballs
> with tons of my own patches to get the little monster working...
>
> What about "xp
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:54:06AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> The name "xprint-xorg" may be slighly misleading since it is not based
> on the plain X.org source; I am using a tree based on the X.org tarballs
> with tons of my own patches to get the little monster working...
>
> What about "x
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it
> > > for
> > > Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
> >
> > I suggest xprint-xorg for the source package. For the binary package I
> > recommend a down-cased version o
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it for
> > > Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
> >
> > I suggest xprint-xorg for the source package. For the binary package I
> > recommend a down-cased version of the
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:42:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Are you comfortable with calling the X.Org XPRINT server binary
> "Xprt-Xorg" or something similar?
Yes, that should be more or less fine.
Next step, I'll prepare a prelimary package of xprint-xorg. I'll let you
know when I'm do
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:42:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Are you comfortable with calling the X.Org XPRINT server binary
> "Xprt-Xorg" or something similar?
Yes, that should be more or less fine.
Next step, I'll prepare a prelimary package of xprint-xorg. I'll let you
know when I'm d
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:02:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 06:51:42PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Um, as a potential user (in the my-package-depends-on sense), it would
> > be nice if there were a virtual packagename (or something similar)
> > that I could depend on.
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:02:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 06:51:42PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Um, as a potential user (in the my-package-depends-on sense), it would
> > be nice if there were a virtual packagename (or something similar)
> > that I could depend on
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 06:51:42PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:28:32AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > I think the assumption should be that XFree86 will eventually fix up its own
> > Xprint server, in which case the X.Org version won't be "required".
>
> Um, as a pot
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:28:32AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I think the assumption should be that XFree86 will eventually fix up its own
> Xprint server, in which case the X.Org version won't be "required".
Um, as a potential user (in the my-package-depends-on sense), it would
be nice if ther
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:07:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 03:53:32PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it for
> > Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
>
> I suggest xpr
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 06:51:42PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:28:32AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > I think the assumption should be that XFree86 will eventually fix up its own
> > Xprint server, in which case the X.Org version won't be "required".
>
> Um, as a po
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:28:32AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I think the assumption should be that XFree86 will eventually fix up its own
> Xprint server, in which case the X.Org version won't be "required".
Um, as a potential user (in the my-package-depends-on sense), it would
be nice if the
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:07:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 03:53:32PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it for
> > Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
>
> I suggest xp
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 03:53:32PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it for
> Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
I suggest xprint-xorg for the source package. For the binary package I
recommend a down-
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 03:53:32PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it for
> Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
I suggest xprint-xorg for the source package. For the binary package I
recommend a down
Drew Parsons wrote:
> The reason it's required, or at least useful, is that the mozilla default
> printing driver (postscript) is, to some degree, broken. Although pages are
> rendered correctly on screen, they are sometimes defective on the printed
> page. For instance, non-latin letters do not
(that's Intention to Intent to Package)
Some useful X code has turned up, and I wanted to check in here about it
first to make sure I wouldn't be stepping on anyone's toes by packaging it.
Most of you (and certainly Branden would be) would be aware that X11 has
this obscure corner known as Xprint
Drew Parsons wrote:
> The reason it's required, or at least useful, is that the mozilla default
> printing driver (postscript) is, to some degree, broken. Although pages are
> rendered correctly on screen, they are sometimes defective on the printed
> page. For instance, non-latin letters do no
(that's Intention to Intent to Package)
Some useful X code has turned up, and I wanted to check in here about it
first to make sure I wouldn't be stepping on anyone's toes by packaging it.
Most of you (and certainly Branden would be) would be aware that X11 has
this obscure corner known as Xprin
22 matches
Mail list logo
