#include
* Branden Robinson [Mon, Jan 27 2003, 12:15:04PM]:
> > > > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > > > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > > > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
#include
* Branden Robinson [Mon, Jan 27 2003, 12:15:04PM]:
> > > > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > > > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > > > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
l attacks,
I have not done so. Fallacious claims of ad hominem attacks are at
least as irrational as ad homimem attacks themselves.
> but this is not a solution and only an ugly way to make people shut
> up.
This is a makeweight assertion which does absolutely nothing in service
of what
l attacks,
I have not done so. Fallacious claims of ad hominem attacks are at
least as irrational as ad homimem attacks themselves.
> but this is not a solution and only an ugly way to make people shut
> up.
This is a makeweight assertion which does absolutely nothing in service
of what
#include
* Branden Robinson [Sun, Jan 26 2003, 04:18:09PM]:
> > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
>
> This m
#include
* Branden Robinson [Sun, Jan 26 2003, 04:18:09PM]:
> > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
>
> This m
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:12:20PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
>
> > I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> > attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> What is your problem with my attit
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:12:20PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
>
> > I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> > attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> What is your problem with my attit
#include
* Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
> I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
Our Users and Free Software, see Social
#include
* Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
> I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
Our Users and Free Software, see Social
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:31PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
> development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
> (gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
> equivalents of their fonts. For
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:31PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
> development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
> (gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
> equivalents of their fonts. For
Hello,
I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
(gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
equivalents of their fonts. For example, Icewm and XChat1.9 need 5..15
seconds (depending on t
Hello,
I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
(gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
equivalents of their fonts. For example, Icewm and XChat1.9 need 5..15
seconds (depending on t
14 matches
Mail list logo