hope like hell.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 09:33:28 2001
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:33:28 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Luxi font licensing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:33:10PM -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan wrote:
> Which of the XFree86 (font) licenses actually meet the requirements of
> the DFSG?
See /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/copyright.
It explicitly mentions which fonts we had to remove due to
DFSG-unfreeness.
The rest are DFSG-f
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:33:10PM -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan wrote:
> Which of the XFree86 (font) licenses actually meet the requirements of
> the DFSG?
See /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/copyright.
It explicitly mentions which fonts we had to remove due to
DFSG-unfreeness.
The rest are DFSG-
Which of the XFree86 (font) licenses actually meet the requirements of
the DFSG?
Here's my quandary:
I am currently talking with the XFree86 developers to include an
OpenType font with their distribution. The organization that I volunteer
for would like to include this font with future versions
Which of the XFree86 (font) licenses actually meet the requirements of
the DFSG?
Here's my quandary:
I am currently talking with the XFree86 developers to include an
OpenType font with their distribution. The organization that I volunteer
for would like to include this font with future versions
5 matches
Mail list logo
