On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
> just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
> both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
On my mach
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
> just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
> both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
On my mac
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
> just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
> both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
>
> And I
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
> just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
> both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
>
> And I
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
> just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
> both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
>
> And
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
> just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
> both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
>
> And
an.org; debian-devel@lists.debian.org;
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.
<< File: ATT00048.dat >> Yes, thats right, it is now apt-able.
Aside from not having kernel modules yet, there are no known packaging
issues.
Same warnings
L PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.
<< File: ATT00048.dat >> Yes, thats right, it is now apt-able.
Aside from not having kernel modules yet, there are no known packaging
issues.
Same warnings from the previous
Yes, thats right, it is now apt-able.
Aside from not having kernel modules yet, there are no known packaging
issues.
Same warnings from the previous message apply.
The URL is http://people.debian.org/~warp/dri/.
For APT throw the following two lines into your /etc/apt/sources.list.
deb http://
Yes, thats right, it is now apt-able.
Aside from not having kernel modules yet, there are no known packaging
issues.
Same warnings from the previous message apply.
The URL is http://people.debian.org/~warp/dri/.
For APT throw the following two lines into your /etc/apt/sources.list.
deb http:/
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:53:13PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17] LIBGL
Jules Bean wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > > > libGL error:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> Indeed, but from the code, you should be able to set
>
> LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH
>
> to point to your *_dri.so files.
DRI User's Giude
Section 8.6 Environment Variables
...
3. LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH can be used to override the default directories
which are searched for 3D dri
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/module
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> > > cannot open shared object file: No such file or dire
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > libGL error: dlopen failed
Jules Bean wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> cannot open shared object file:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:53:13PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:36:57PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> They are still very much in testing, follow the depends on the packages,
> and, err, you may have to do an ldconfig after installing xlibmesa3-dri,
> I forgot that in the postinst and I'm going to sleep now, again, I'll
> deal wit
Jules Bean wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > > > libGL error: dlopen
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> Indeed, but from the code, you should be able to set
>
> LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH
>
> to point to your *_dri.so files.
DRI User's Giude
Section 8.6 Environment Variables
...
3. LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH can be used to override the default directories
which are searched for 3D dr
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > >
> > > > jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > > jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> > > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr
Jules Bean wrote:
> jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No su
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:36:57PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> They are still very much in testing, follow the depends on the packages,
> and, err, you may have to do an ldconfig after installing xlibmesa3-dri,
> I forgot that in the postinst and I'm going to sleep now, again, I'll
> deal wi
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:11:57PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> > The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> > http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> > sort that out tomorrow.
>
> Did you miss the
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:36:57 -0500
"Zephaniah E\. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
OK. Please post to this list and say when it's aptable.
> The
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
Did you miss the memo that this sort of thing should be on klecker and
referenced through people.d
The subject says most of it, the packages are at
http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
sort that out tomorrow.
They are still very much in testing, follow the depends on the packages,
and, err, you may have to do an ldconfig after installing xlibmesa3-dri,
I forg
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:11:57PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> > The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> > http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> > sort that out tomorrow.
>
> Did you miss the
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:36:57 -0500
"Zephaniah E\. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
OK. Please post to this list and say when it's aptable.
> Th
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
Did you miss the memo that this sort of thing should be on klecker and
referenced through people.
The subject says most of it, the packages are at
http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
sort that out tomorrow.
They are still very much in testing, follow the depends on the packages,
and, err, you may have to do an ldconfig after installing xlibmesa3-dri,
I for
34 matches
Mail list logo
