Dear community,
Would be great to improve the dependency. What about marking cpp as optional
package for x11-xserver-utils? Or maybe there could be another additional
package x11-xserver-utils-nocpp which does not
depend on cpp ?
--
With best regards,
Dmitry
Hi,
* Michael Gilbert [Tue Jul 21, 2015 at 11:20:04PM -0400]:
> > The packages x11-xserver-utils and x11-apps both depend on cpp. Since
> > these are "miscellaneous assortment of X applications" and not
> > development tools, I think they should not depend on cpp.
> Here is a trivial patch that
control: tag -1 patch
> The packages x11-xserver-utils and x11-apps both depend on cpp. Since
> these are "miscellaneous assortment of X applications" and not
> development tools, I think they should not depend on cpp.
Here is a trivial patch that makes it possible for the user to choose
(as a no
On 2014-05-28 22:23 +0200, Martin Vegter wrote:
> Package: x11-xserver-utils
> Version: 7.7~3
>
> The packages x11-xserver-utils and x11-apps both depend on cpp. Since
> these are "miscellaneous assortment of X applications" and not
> development tools, I think they should not depend on cpp.
>
> T
Package: x11-xserver-utils
Version: 7.7~3
The packages x11-xserver-utils and x11-apps both depend on cpp. Since
these are "miscellaneous assortment of X applications" and not
development tools, I think they should not depend on cpp.
There are people like myself, who like to keep their installati
5 matches
Mail list logo
