On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 23:32:58 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> The current situation just makes some people (eg. me ;) break the
> dependency link that's the weakest to get rid of useless drivers, with
> the results described in my original report.
>
That's good, then we can point and laugh.
Cheer
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:33:47AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >>> The current situation just makes some people (eg. me ;) break the
> >>> dependency link that's the weakest to get rid of useless drivers, with
> >>> the results described in my original report.
> >> What are you gaining?
> >>
Hey,
Op 30-05-12 00:30, Yann Dirson schreef:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:45:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Even then, why this Depends of ati on all 3 drivers ? I can "dpkg -r
>>> --force-depends" both mach64 and r128, and ati+radeon does startup
>>> without complaining at all. Shouldn'
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:45:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Even then, why this Depends of ati on all 3 drivers ? I can "dpkg -r
> > --force-depends" both mach64 and r128, and ati+radeon does startup
> > without complaining at all. Shouldn't this be downgraded to a
> > Recommends as well
Yann Dirson (29/05/2012):
> OK I understand that there is no absolute requirement for -ati, and
> thus a Depends is probably not a good idea for some users. But for
> the vast majority, who will want to use it, what about adding a note
> in package descriptions of {mach64,r128,radeon} that the -a
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:02:14AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> The dependency in squeeze (and in other suites) is:
> ati→{mach64,r128,radeon}
>
> there's no:
> radeon→ati
OK, my bad - surely some confusion on my side.
> > But the result is, GLX is entirely disabled, and we can see a "fa
6 matches
Mail list logo
