Bug#668828: Appears virtual desktop stays large regardless of efforts to limit.

2012-04-18 Thread Straight BolognaSandwich
Mr. Dänzer, Thank you for the clarification. I was basing my speculation regarding the meaning of "maximum 4096 x4096" on section II.5 of the linked wiki which may be dated, incorrect, or more likely--I misinterpreted it. http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12 I appreciate your efforts.

Bug#668828: Appears virtual desktop stays large regardless of efforts to limit.

2012-04-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2012-04-17 at 13:11 -0500, Straight BolognaSandwich wrote: > > In Debian 7 Gnome Classic with the aforementioned "workaround 3" in > place to get around display corruption, I see: xrandr -q > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 4096 x 4096 > DVI-I-2 connected 1280x102

Bug#668828: Appears virtual desktop stays large regardless of efforts to limit.

2012-04-17 Thread Straight BolognaSandwich
Another observation:. In Debian 7 Gnome Classic with the aforementioned "workaround 3" in place to get around display corruption, I see: xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 4096 x 4096 DVI-I-2 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm