The thing that returns ENOMEM in fork.c when this failure occurs is:
dup_mm
I still have to see why.
To try distinguishing between the ENOMEM returns, I tried adding
a flag to the return value (eg:
retval = -(ENOMEM | 0x8000)
retval = -(ENOMEM | 0x4000)
retval = -(ENOMEM | 0x2000)
etc
b
One more clue:
in kern.log, when xserver is running under hypervisor, this appears:
Nov 21 22:05:13 blueeyes kernel: [ 45.899070] Xorg:2949 map pfn expected
mapping type writ
e-back for d000-e000, got write-combining
Nov 21 22:05:13 blueeyes kernel: [ 46.067758] Xorg:2949 freeing in
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:30:58AM -0500, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> Please let me know if there is any other info you need. I'm not
> sure what to do next.
I've gotten the source for the kernel I'm using, and put a bunch
of debug statements in the kernel/fork.c:do_fork routine (to
distinguish bet
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> apt is being stupid and trying to satisfy build-deps for the backports
> xorg-server. Try "apt-get build-dep xorg-server=2:1.7.7-13".
Thank you! I also had to apt-get source xorg-server=2:1.7.7-13,
as I had gotten the source packa
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 21:58:39 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 19:39:32 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> > > I can't help thinking I started out wrong, to be having all these problems
> > > building a st
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 19:39:32 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> > I can't help thinking I started out wrong, to be having all these problems
> > building a stock debian package on a debian stable system.
> >
> It doesn't sound lik
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 19:39:32 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
>
> > On to the next hurdle: installing libudev-dev, because it didn't
> > get installed with build-dep either.
>
> Installing libudev-dev, as well as x11proto-gl-dev was no problem.
>
> Then it wanted me to install x11proto-xf86d
> On to the next hurdle: installing libudev-dev, because it didn't
> get installed with build-dep either.
Installing libudev-dev, as well as x11proto-gl-dev was no problem.
Then it wanted me to install x11proto-xf86dri-dev, which I did,
but the subsequent build attempt gave this error:
co
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:19:53PM -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
>
> Cannot build: I probably did something wrong, but what?
I had to install libtool:
sudo apt-get install libtool libtool-doc
Found the solution in ubuntu forums, now it's in debian bug tracker
too : - )
On to the next hurdle
Cannot build: I probably did something wrong, but what?
did apt-get build-dep xserver-xorg
then tried fakeroot debian/rules binary and had to install
quilt and xutils-dev separately because they didn't get
installed with build-dep, then this:
bjb@blueeyes:~/projects/xserver-xorg/xorg-server-
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:00:33PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 13:41:02 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
>
> >
> > Coming back to this - I see that the command line will be printed out
> > if a debug flag is set - how do I set it?
> >
> > in ddxList.c on lines 206-207:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 13:41:02 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
>
> Coming back to this - I see that the command line will be printed out
> if a debug flag is set - how do I set it?
>
> in ddxList.c on lines 206-207:
>
> if (xkbDebugFlags)
> DebugF("[xkb] xkbList executes: %
Coming back to this - I see that the command line will be printed out
if a debug flag is set - how do I set it?
in ddxList.c on lines 206-207:
if (xkbDebugFlags)
DebugF("[xkb] xkbList executes: %s\n",buf);
How can I set xbkDebugFlags? I'd like to try the exact invocation
at
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:57:23 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> I don't have any .xkb or .xkm files on my system (the xkbcomp man
> page says it uses and produces files of those names) although I
> do have a directory /usr/share/X11/xkb.
>
The .xkm files are created by xkbcomp in /tmp or /var/l
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:02:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 22:35:20 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
>
> > Package: xinit
> > Version: 1.2.0-2
> > Severity: important
> > File: /usr/bin/xinit
> >
> >
> > using 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 I can run an X server, but using
> >
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 22:35:20 -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> Package: xinit
> Version: 1.2.0-2
> Severity: important
> File: /usr/bin/xinit
>
>
> using 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 I can run an X server, but using
> 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (the same) under the Xen 4.0 hypervisor, I cannot.
>
> The Xorg.l
16 matches
Mail list logo
