Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided

2011-08-29 Thread Andrew Deason
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:23:07 +0200 Michel Dänzer wrote: > And to reiterate on what Cyril said: If the Gallium driver is slower > than swrast_dri.so (doing what?) Everything. As in, including basic drawing of windows (which I assume is something with KMS or the radeon driver or... I dunno yet); y

Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided

2011-08-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2011-08-28 at 13:16 -0500, Andrew Deason wrote: > > On my system, using KMS and DRI2 is really slow (this is known in at > least some cases; KMS/DRI2 just isn't as mature right now, I think? See > 572911, 607510, and probably others). So, I have disabled KMS and just > want to use regular

Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided

2011-08-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2011-08-28 at 13:16 -0500, Andrew Deason wrote: > > 1. Just install the non-Gallium r300_dri.so instead of the Gallium one > (I assume you don't want to do this, since the Gallium driver is > deliberately chosen, and for all I know is much better on other > systems) > > 2.

Bug#639621: closed by Cyril Brulebois (Re: Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided)

2011-08-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 14:05:26 -0500, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:57:14 + > ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > > > That's something we're not keen on doing, at all. Alternatives or > > diversions mean users are going to get broken stuff at some poi

Bug#639621: closed by Cyril Brulebois (Re: Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided)

2011-08-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Andrew Deason (28/08/2011): > Fine, but is the Gallium driver ever going to support DRI1? Currently > the radeon X driver reports that r300_dri.so should be used when DRI is > requested, which is wrong; currently that will not work at all. Will it > in the future? I think you want to ask that on

Bug#639621: closed by Cyril Brulebois (Re: Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided)

2011-08-28 Thread Andrew Deason
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:57:14 + ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > That's something we're not keen on doing, at all. Alternatives or > diversions mean users are going to get broken stuff at some point, and > concentrating on getting the Gallium drivers to work is someth

Bug#639621: libgl1-mesa-dri: A DRI1-capable r300_dri.so should be provided

2011-08-28 Thread Andrew Deason
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri Version: 7.11-4 On my system, using KMS and DRI2 is really slow (this is known in at least some cases; KMS/DRI2 just isn't as mature right now, I think? See 572911, 607510, and probably others). So, I have disabled KMS and just want to use regular DRI, which is currently m