On 25/03/2011 01:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
There have been several such reports already; there's a clear
regression in stable, with a guilty commit already known. What would
an extra bug buy us?
I understand your point, KiBi.
And i agree too that probably to you (xsf devels), there wouldn't be
Cesare Leonardi (24/03/2011):
> Why closing bug as #619053 and #619470 as duplicate, instead of
> reassigning and merging with #619019? Isn't it more useful to see
> that there are many bugs open referring to the same problem?
There have been several such reports already; there's a clear
regressi
On 20/03/2011 22:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
HB (20/03/2011):
> the latest update in squeeze-updates made my mouse cursor
> invisible. the cursor is still there (i can click etc.) but
> invisible. x was working without problems before.
thanks for the report, but closing, as a duplicate of #6190
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:49:48 +0100
with message-id <20110320214948.gd27...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#619053: xserver-xorg: invisible mouse cursor
has caused the Debian Bug report #619053,
regarding xserver-xorg: invisible mouse cursor
to be marked as done.
This means tha
4 matches
Mail list logo
