[Holger Levsen]
> Petter has replaced it with a recommends on ddccontrol|xresprobe already.
Yes, in our svn. But initial testing of ddccontrol seem to indicate
that it do not report the DDC info I want from the monitor. Frequency
info is missing. So ddccontrol do not seem to be a sensible
alte
Hi,
On Freitag, 31. Dezember 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> @h01ger: Could you please get rid of the Recommends on xresprobe?
Petter has replaced it with a recommends on ddccontrol|xresprobe already.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 608187 + patch
Bug #608187 [src:xresprobe] xresprobe: FTBFS on i386: error: 'IF_MASK'
undeclared
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
608187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
tags 608187 + patch
thanks
The attached patch get xresprobe / ddcprobe to build again. It make
it possible to keep it for Squeeze. The patch is tested on
Linux/i686.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
diff -ur xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/ddcprobe/lrmi.c
xresprobe-0.4.23debian1-pere/ddcprobe/lr
On 12/31/2010 05:32 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Adding -release + Holger to Cc.)
Adam D. Barratt (30/12/2010):
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
Given its upload history (or more accurately in recent times
[Cyril Brulebois]
> Depending on what you need, read-edid (through its get-edid binary)
> might help you get what you need? Or ddccontrol, or whatever. Not
> sure what your testsuite needs.
Have looked at read-edid, and it was useless, but have not tried
ddccontrol. The testsuite in debian-edu-co
(Adding -release + Holger to Cc.)
Adam D. Barratt (30/12/2010):
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
>
> Given its upload history (or more accurately in recent times, its
> lack of the same), Julien suggeste
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
Given its upload history (or more accurately in recent times, its lack
of the same), Julien suggested that we might be better off simply
dropping xresprobe. The only package w
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
>
> | gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c -o lrmi.o lrmi.c
> | lrmi.c: In function 'set_regs':
> | lrmi.c:191: error: 'IF_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
[...]
> Other p
Source: xresprobe
Version: 0.4.23debian1-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
| gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c -o lrmi.o lrmi.c
| lrmi.c: In function 'set_regs':
| lrmi.c:191: error: 'IF_MASK' undeclared
10 matches
Mail list logo