Bug#600129: #600129 xterm: segmentation fault with -fb and other options

2010-10-14 Thread Friedrich Delgado
Yes, I didn't write either one of the original reports. I also very much doubt that this is exploitable, that's why I thought severity "normal" was appropriate. Thomas Dickey schrieb: > This is fixed in #263. Good to know, thanks! > Actually, the bug is not noticeable on my machines unless usi

Bug#600129: #600129 xterm: segmentation fault with -fb and other options

2010-10-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Friedrich Delgado wrote: Yes, I didn't write either one of the original reports. I also very much doubt that this is exploitable, that's why I thought severity "normal" was appropriate. Thomas Dickey schrieb: This is fixed in #263. Good to know, thanks! no problem (I

Bug#600129: #600129 xterm: segmentation fault with -fb and other options

2010-10-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
This is fixed in #263. Actually, the bug is not noticeable on my machines unless using valgrind. If it weren't for the incorrect report, I'd have continued on #588785. later. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net signature.asc Description: Digital signatu