On 2011-12-01 19:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 16:06:55 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-06-13 01:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:45:42 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This probably is due to your
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 16:06:55 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-06-13 01:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:45:42 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This probably is due to your high resolution and low video memory - a
> >> 1900x1200 tru
On 2010-06-13 01:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:45:42 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
>
>> This probably is due to your high resolution and low video memory - a
>> 1900x1200 truecolour framebuffer takes up slightly more than half your
>> VRAM.
>>
> I gue
Yes this is what I thought as well.
Achim
On 06/13/2010 01:19 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:45:42 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
This probably is due to your high resolution and low video memory - a
1900x1200 truecolour framebuffer takes up slightly mor
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:45:42 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> This probably is due to your high resolution and low video memory - a
> 1900x1200 truecolour framebuffer takes up slightly more than half your
> VRAM.
>
I guess ideally the driver could try allocating a smaller frameb
This probably is due to your high resolution and low video memory - a
1900x1200 truecolour framebuffer takes up slightly more than half your
VRAM.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:0.0.16+git20100518+4b8f1a0-1
Severity: normal
File: nouveau
Hi,
I know this is a quite old grafics card, but a quite high resolutin.
When starting the system the kernel detects the right monitor resolution, and
switches to this mode (1920x1200).
Bu
7 matches
Mail list logo
