On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:30:31 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 12:05 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > If the files that actually included from other ones (I didn't check all
> > of them), then yeah, I'd say it's a bug in the Makefile.am.
>
> I just filed it with upstream:
>
> htt
On 11/19/2009 12:05 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> If the files that actually included from other ones (I didn't check all
> of them), then yeah, I'd say it's a bug in the Makefile.am.
I just filed it with upstream:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25190
Thanks for the feedback, Julie
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:04:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 11:40 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > They should all come from the upstream repo, I think they're just
> > missing from the upstream tarball due to INTEL_G4I in Makefile.am not
> > listing all of them. The .g4i and
On 11/19/2009 11:40 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> They should all come from the upstream repo, I think they're just
> missing from the upstream tarball due to INTEL_G4I in Makefile.am not
> listing all of them. The .g4i and .g4a files are source for the .g4b
> ones, which are usually not rebuilt fro
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:07:44 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 05:54 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > They're assembly for the gen4 hardware (965 and up). I have to admit
> > I've never looked at that language. It's probably documented in the
> > i965 docs, and the assembler is
On 11/19/2009 05:54 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> They're assembly for the gen4 hardware (965 and up). I have to admit
> I've never looked at that language. It's probably documented in the
> i965 docs, and the assembler is at
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gen4asm/
so where did those
[moving away from the bug since this gets off-topic]
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 17:55:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 11/18/2009 04:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Having maintainers for X in Debian would be a Nice Thing ;)
>
> heh. Touché. And thanks for all your work so far, Julien!
On 11/18/2009 04:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Having maintainers for X in Debian would be a Nice Thing ;)
heh. Touché. And thanks for all your work so far, Julien!
> 2.9.1 is mostly ready in git, it needs someone to prepare an upload.
> If you want to help I'm happy to add you to the pkg-xorg
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 15:16:32 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> hi intel xorg maintainers--
>
> This is just a followup to note that upgrading debian's version
> of xserver-xorg-video-intel to 2.9.1 would be a Nice Thing.
>
Having maintainers for X in Debian would be a Nice Thing ;)
2.9.1 i
hi intel xorg maintainers--
This is just a followup to note that upgrading debian's version
of xserver-xorg-video-intel to 2.9.1 would be a Nice Thing.
I just built a package by pulling in the upstream tarball:
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/driver/xf86-video-intel-2.9.1.tar.gz
10 matches
Mail list logo
