Hi,
* Cyril Brulebois [100226 17:13]:
> Could you please check with 2.6.32-9 from sid? The one you have is
> indeed the latest… in squeeze (which I was fearing somehow). sid's
> would be linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64; many X-related regressions got
> fixed between -5 and -9.
I just tried it. Same i
Martin Gollowitzer (26/02/2010):
> My kernel version is:
>
> Linux wingback 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 22:40:40 UTC 2010 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> The dpkg command above gives:
>
> linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 2.6.32-5
>
> I will again have to stick with 2.6.31 for the moment as thes
Hi,
* Cyril Brulebois [100225 15:52]:
> Martin Gollowitzer (25/02/2010):
> > Please find the desired information below.
>
> For the 2.6.32 kernel, please. :) The idea is to track down the
> regression. Since you don't run it, you could use that instead:
>
> $ dpkg -l 'linux-image-2.6.32*'|grep
Martin Gollowitzer (25/02/2010):
> Please find the desired information below.
For the 2.6.32 kernel, please. :) The idea is to track down the
regression. Since you don't run it, you could use that instead:
$ dpkg -l 'linux-image-2.6.32*'|grep ^ii|awk '{print $2 $3}'
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Hi,
* Cyril Brulebois [100225 15:31]:
> Could you please give us the accurate kernel version? (e.g. the output
> of “uname -a”, and “dpkg -l linux-image-$(uname -r)” should do).
Please find the desired information below.
Thanks,
Martin
--8<
Martin Gollowitzer (25/02/2010):
> * Brice Goglin [100225 10:29]: > Which
> kernel do you use right now ? Make sure you try the *latest* >
> 2.6.32 package in unstable or even a 2.6.33 kernel.
>
> 2.6.32 does not work at all.
Could you please give us the accurate kernel version? (e.g. the outpu
Martin Gollowitzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this helps in finding the actual problem, but when I
> enable KMS, this bug disappears. Since KMS breaks other things, I can't
> use it at the moment.
>
Which kernel do you use right now ? Make sure you try the *latest*
2.6.32 package in unsta
* Brice Goglin [100225 10:29]:
> Which kernel do you use right now ? Make sure you try the *latest*
> 2.6.32 package in unstable or even a 2.6.33 kernel.
2.6.32 does not work at all. At gdm login screen, the field for username
is black instead of white and I can't do anything. I'm using 2.6.31 fr
Hi,
I don't know if this helps in finding the actual problem, but when I
enable KMS, this bug disappears. Since KMS breaks other things, I can't
use it at the moment.
All the best,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
9 matches
Mail list logo
