On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:40:12 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > This is definitely not true as long as testing still has console-setup
> > 1.28. It might be ok to drop the versioned dep, but not before a newer
> > c-s has tr
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> This is definitely not true as long as testing still has console-setup
> 1.28. It might be ok to drop the versioned dep, but not before a newer
> c-s has transitioned to testing, IMO.
> (even then, I'm not convinced that removing
[quoting the whole mail for debian-x's benefit]
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:33:22 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I think it is safe to use unversioned dependency because even the oldest
> versions of console-setup used the same syntax for its configuration
> file and had all features X needs. T
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 527124 xserver-xorg
Bug#527124: [console-setup-mini] should provide console-setup
Bug reassigned from package `console-setup-mini' to `xserver-xorg'.
> retitle 527124 Please use unversioned dependency for console-
4 matches
Mail list logo
