On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> darren wrote:
>> x11perf -aa10text glxgears
>> EXA: 459000.0/sec 45FPS
>> UXA : 654000.0/sec 430FPS
>>
>
> The glxgears column is meaningless.
May I quote Gunter Ohrne: glxgear which is no meanin
darren wrote:
>x11perf -aa10text glxgears
> EXA: 459000.0/sec 45FPS
> UXA :654000.0/sec430FPS
>
The glxgears column is meaningless.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
sorry,post from google groups seems not working,So I post again.
> Hi Gunter,
>
> thanks for going through this pain of kernel testing :)
>
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 11:24 +0200, Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> > Unfortunately PAT does not seem to be the (only) culprit, I still get:
> >
> > $ egrep 'tiling' <
Hi Gunter,
thanks for going through this pain of kernel testing :)
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 11:24 +0200, Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> Unfortunately PAT does not seem to be the (only) culprit, I still get:
>
> $ egrep 'tiling' < /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> (EE) intel(0): Failed to set tiling on front buffer: re
Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux Zweiblum 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 26 01:08:11 UTC 2009 i686
> > GNU/Linux
> > $ egrep '_PAT(_| )' < /boot/config-2.6.26-2-686
> > # CONFIG_X86_PAT is not set
> PAT wasn't supported at all in 2.6.26.
Mh, at least the conf
Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> Mh, I just checked my 2.6.26's image configuration, and it also seems to
> have PAT disabled:
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux Zweiblum 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 26 01:08:11 UTC 2009 i686
> GNU/Linux
> $ egrep '_PAT(_| )' < /boot/config-2.6.26-2-686
> # CONFIG_X86_PAT is not set
>
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2009 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> PAT is disabled in 2.6.29, we feel like it may explain some performance
> problems if the video memory isn't in write combining anymore.
Mh, I just checked my 2.6.26's image configuration, and it also seems to
have PAT disabled:
$ uname -a
Li
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2009 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> > So, what's wrong - or at least that different - with Debian's 2.6.29
> > kernel?
> PAT is disabled in 2.6.29, we feel like it may explain some performance
> problems if the video memory isn't in write combining anymore.
Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> # uname -a
> Linux Zweiblum 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 26 01:08:11 UTC 2009 i686
> GNU/Linux
>
> Ok, guess what - with Debian's 2.6.26 package it feels quick and snappy.
>
> # x11perf -aa10text
> (...)
> 360 trep @ 0.0073 msec (137000.0/sec): Char in 80-
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2009 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> > I just upgraded to package version 2:2.7.0-1 with no improvement.
> > Composite mode with EXA still is unusuably slow.
> Can you try without another kernel? Either Debian's old 2.6.26 or a
> custom 2.6.29 with PAT enabled.
# uname -a
Lin
Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just upgraded to package version 2:2.7.0-1 with no improvement.
>
> Composite mode with EXA still is unusuably slow.
>
Can you try without another kernel? Either Debian's old 2.6.26 or a
custom 2.6.29 with PAT enabled.
> I still have to check whether XAA works
11 matches
Mail list logo
