On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 23:55:25 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> This appears to be a re-introduction of the fix from xfs 1:1.0.4-2?
>
Not really, it was an incomplete fix.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:50:25PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Package: xfs
> Version: 1:1.0.8-2.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: security
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty
>
> Hello,
>
> There is a bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker about xfs's init script being used
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:03:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Do we want to keep shipping xfs in squeeze? What are its use cases
> these days?
I think there may be things like LTSP that use it (where client-side fonts
aren't much fun). However, I'm not entirely certain since I stopped using
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:50 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> There is a bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker about xfs's init script being used
> in an unsafe fashion. It seems that OpenSUSE has solved this as well:
>
> "set_up_socket_dir moves /tmp/.font-unix to /tmp/.font-unix.$$.
> Unfortunately $$ is predi
Package: xfs
Version: 1:1.0.8-2.1
Severity: normal
Tags: security
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty
Hello,
There is a bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker about xfs's init script being used
in an unsafe fashion. It seems that OpenSUSE has solved this as well:
"set_up_s
5 matches
Mail list logo