Bug#485775: dependence between compiz-foo and libdecoration

2008-06-11 Thread sean finney
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 02:15:28 pm Julien Cristau wrote: > libdecoration0.shlibs still says 'libdecoration0 (>= 0.5.0)', which > seems wrong. I guess that should be bumped to 0.7.6. Sean? yeah, i think so. you think this should trigger an immediate upload and reset the sid->lenny transition?

Bug#485775: dependence between compiz-foo and libdecoration

2008-06-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 13:27:31 +0200, Daniele Ferro wrote: > After replacing all my compiz related packages to the version >= > 0.7.6-1, the problem reported in bug #483819 was still not solved. > The output with the command "compiz --replace" was this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ compiz --replace

Bug#485775: dependence between compiz-foo and libdecoration

2008-06-11 Thread Daniele Ferro
Package: compiz Version: 0.7.6-3 After replacing all my compiz related packages to the version >= 0.7.6-1, the problem reported in bug #483819 was still not solved. The output with the command "compiz --replace" was this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ compiz --replace Checking for Xgl: not present. Detec