age is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
420419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
P
Hi,
Brice Goglin (24/04/2007):
> I don't know about ion3, but I know that lots of window managers
> allow you to put your mail client on one Xinerama screen and flag it
> "appear on all workspace" so that it always appear while you switch
> between workspaces in the other screen.
could you pleas
You are a certified winner of £250,000,000.00Pounds by the microsoft
online award 2009,please for Claims.fill in below your names,address,
sex, age, Mobile, occupation.
Regard
Mr. P. Griffin
Co-ordinator
{p.griffin009...@8u8.hk}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 17:14:26 +0100, Balázsi Miklós wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to upgrade from etch to lenny. Tought that it is stable enough.
> When I tried to boot up with my Xorg.conf used in etch I got the same crash.
> Is there any way to configure dualhead card with lenny?
See http
Hi,
I was told that RandR 1.2 doesn't support multi-head with more than one
card, so RandR is not an option in this setup.
Regards,
Tino
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julien Wajsberg wrote:
> I'm basically having the same problem (same segfault), but I can't
> find the correct way to configure my X server with the new intel driver.
> In fact I'm using two very different video cards for my xinerama
> setup: one i845G (driver intel) and one old Matrox Mystique (dr
Hi,
I'm basically having the same problem (same segfault), but I can't find the
correct way to configure my X server with the new intel driver.
In fact I'm using two very different video cards for my xinerama setup: one
i845G (driver intel) and one old Matrox Mystique (driver mga). I couldn't
find
Brice Goglin wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM:
> Ruben Porras wrote:
>
>> If I add the Virtual option, I get the same effect as before
>> with Xinerama. If I remove the Virtual both monitors have the same copy
>> of the image.
>>
>> Neither of the is what I have before. Before I have two independ
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Seg, 2007-04-23 às 21:45 +0200, Brice Goglin escreveu:
>
>> I am not sure people are working on what you want nowadays. It looks
>> like XRandR 1.2 (i.e. improved Xinerama) will rule the world. However,
>> XRandR may provides almost what you want if the window manager does
Seg, 2007-04-23 às 21:45 +0200, Brice Goglin escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > 1) I couldn't make the X server work with two different screens (I
> > mean :0.0 and :0.1), I only get a xinerama-like support, which is not
> > what I want (I like to have 2 x more desktops of the same size and not
>
Ruben Porras wrote:
>> You want to move in virtual
>> desktops on one screen without moving on the other one?
>>
>
> Can I get this behaviour back?
>
I don't know about ion3, but I know that lots of window managers allow
you to put your mail client on one Xinerama screen and flag it "app
Am Dienstag, den 24.04.2007, 19:51 +0200 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Ruben Porras wrote:
> > I know that maybe this info is anywere else, but I cannot find it. I
> > followed your instructions, but then I do not get the same results as
> > before. If I add the Virtual option, I get the same effect as b
Ruben Porras wrote:
> I know that maybe this info is anywere else, but I cannot find it. I
> followed your instructions, but then I do not get the same results as
> before. If I add the Virtual option, I get the same effect as before
> with Xinerama. If I remove the Virtual both monitors have the s
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2007, 21:16 +0200 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> > Section "Screen"
> > Identifier "LCD Screen"
> > Device "915-LCD"
> > Monitor "LCD"
> > DefaultDepth24
> > SubSection "Display"
> > Depth 16
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> 1) I couldn't make the X server work with two different screens (I
> mean :0.0 and :0.1), I only get a xinerama-like support, which is not
> what I want (I like to have 2 x more desktops of the same size and not
> having 2 x bigger the same number of desktops).
>
I am not
Hi,
I've recently updated to the new version, I had the old config for
dual-head, and it was breaking the X server. I've followed what is in
this bug report and it worked as expected except for some things...
1) I couldn't make the X server work with two different screens (I
mean :0.0 and :0.1),
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 420419 xserver-xorg-video-intel crashes with old dual-head config
Bug#420419: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Chrashes on startup
Changed Bug title to xserver-xorg-video-intel crashes with old dual-head config
from xserver-xorg-video-intel: Chras
retitle 420419 xserver-xorg-video-intel crashes with old dual-head config
forwarded 420419 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10706
thank you
Ruben Porras wrote:
> yup, it contains dual-head.
>
Ok it explains the crash. There's already an upstream bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop
severity 420219 important
thank you
Ruben Porras wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
> Version: 2:2.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
It's not unusable for everybody fortunately :) A crash of the server
usually goes to severity important.
> After upg
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading the server is no more able to start.
xauth: creating new authority file /home/bennett/.serverauth.5642
X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protoco
20 matches
Mail list logo
