Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-10-04 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Wed, Oct 04 2006, at 04:26 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi All > > On Tue, Oct 03 2006, at 22:12 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:44:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for > > > > some >

Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-10-03 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi All On Tue, Oct 03 2006, at 22:12 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:44:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for > > > some > > > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens

Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-10-03 Thread Denis Barbier
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:44:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some > > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a > > set > > +e block): > > > db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE" > > retval

Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-10-03 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a set > +e block): > db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE" > retval=$? > if [ $retval -ne 0 ] ; then debug_echo "v_s_d_i/db_input $PRIORITY $TEMP

Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-09-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 11:40 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some > > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a > > set > > +e block)

Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-09-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 11:40 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a set > +e block): > > db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE" > retval=$? > if [ $retval -ne 0 ]

Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-09-21 Thread Bas Wijnen
tags 388568 +patch thanks I have found the problem. On line 966 of the postinst it says: db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE" || debug_echo "v_s_d_i/db_input $PRIORITY $TEMPLATE" This is followed by if [ $? -eq 30 ]; then The return value of 30 is specified for db_input. However, if db_input ret

Processed: Re: Bug#388568: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg: postinst can hang)

2006-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 388568 +patch Bug#388568: xserver-xorg: postinst can hang There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs