On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now
> > are:
> >
> > - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:39:17AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now
> > > are:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
> >
> > (needs lib32ice first)
>
> Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch supp
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now
> are:
>
> - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According to
>http://wiki.debian.org/toolchain-multiarch, there are plans to
Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch .
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:06:36PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch .
Thanks.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
--
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:12:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:06:36PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch .
>
> Thanks.
Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now
are:
- A more stand
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:23:23PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > Patch attached for 32-bit bia
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
> > >
> > > (needs lib32ice f
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
> >
> > (needs lib32ice first)
>
> Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch supp
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
>
> (needs lib32ice first)
Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support
instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need
Package: libsm6
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
(needs lib32ice first)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architec
14 matches
Mail list logo