On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:08:41 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Xorg provides a dummy video driver and a void input driver, so yes,
> building Xorg is perfectly valid.
>
Oops, I had forgotten that...
Then the #ifdef's in hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c probably
need to add a test for __s390
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:08:41AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Xorg provides a dummy video driver and a void input driver, so yes,
> building Xorg is perfectly valid.
I have an updated version of the 06 patch, which fixes this part for
s390. But it fails later, as the ioport util wants to use in*
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:56:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 8, 2006 at 21:42:11 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although
> > xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with
> > severity: important),
On Sat, Jul 8, 2006 at 21:42:11 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although
> xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with
> severity: important), it provides binary packages like xvfb that used to
> be availa
severity 362641 serious
thanks
Hi,
I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although
xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with
severity: important), it provides binary packages like xvfb that used to
be available for s390 and now are not, causing othe
5 matches
Mail list logo
