Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:09:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:15:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Thanks for confirming that .la files are serious, serious braindamage, > > > > that's also what I thought

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:09:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:15:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Thanks for confirming that .la files are serious, serious braindamage, > > > that's also what I thought when I first saw them years a

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:15:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:47:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > > Yes. It was a deliberate decision; any package still referencing > > > > >

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:15:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:47:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > Yes. It was a deliberate decision; any package still referencing > > > > libXcursor.la has to be recompi

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:47:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:17:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > > > > 1.1.3-1 included file /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, required by other packages > > > > (in my case, gnome-co

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:47:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:17:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > > > > > 1.1.3-1 included file /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, required by other > > > >

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:17:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > > > 1.1.3-1 included file /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, required by other packages > > > (in my case, gnome-control-center.) > > > 1.1.5.2 does not include it. > > > > How does this regr

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:17:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > > 1.1.3-1 included file /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, required by other packages > > (in my case, gnome-control-center.) > > 1.1.5.2 does not include it. > > How does this regression happen? > Did you make the

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > 1.1.3-1 included file /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, required by other packages > (in my case, gnome-control-center.) > 1.1.5.2 does not include it. How does this regression happen? Did you make the new package from scratch? (instead of using: http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xc

Bug#354674: Missing /usr/lib/libXcursor.la

2006-02-27 Thread Jeremy Nickurak
Package: libxcursor-dev Version: 1.1.5.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental 1.1.3-1 included file /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, required by other packages (in my case, gnome-control-center.) 1.1.5.2 does not include it. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers experimen