Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 20:31 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > >> > >> MergedFB false doesn't send signal to secondary, [...] > > > > I think that's expected, as MergedFB unifies all > > s

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-06 Thread Dominique Dumont
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> >> MergedFB false doesn't send signal to secondary, [...] > > I think that's expected, as MergedFB unifies all > single-device-multiple-outputs configurations including clone mode. So we m

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:49 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> I really don't think it is done on purpose: Why bother going >> through all the mode validation on the secondary, and _SELECT_ a >> mode(line) from the secondary if it i

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> I read this too fast: What you report is exactly what this bug >> report is about: 6.9.0-1 with MergedFB false doesn't send signal to >> secondary, [...] > I think that

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:49 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > I really don't think it is done on purpose: Why bother going through > all the mode validation on the secondary, and _SELECT_ a mode(line) > from the secondary if it is to turn off output to it? Look at the > logs. The driver thinks

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > I read this too fast: What you report is exactly what this bug report > is about: 6.9.0-1 with MergedFB false doesn't send signal to > secondary, [...] I think that's expected, as MergedFB unifies all single-device-multiple-outputs

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-05 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:48:49PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: >> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Section "Device" >>> Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary" >>> Driver "ati" >>>

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-05 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Section "Device" >> Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary" >> Driver "ati" >> BusID "PCI:2:0:0" >> #Option "CloneMode" "128

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-05 Thread Dominique Dumont
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Section "Device" > Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary" > Driver "ati" > BusID "PCI:2:0:0" > # Option "CloneMode" "1280x1024" > # Option "CloneDisplay" "0" > Screen

Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: breaks dual-head on radeon: more info

2006-01-05 Thread Javier Kohen
Hi, El jue, 05-01-2006 a las 18:02 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane escribió: > Package: xserver-xorg > Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1 > Followup-For: Bug #332548 > > I tried using >Option "IgnoreEDID" "true" > doesn't help. I also tried putting explicitly the ModeLine that comes > from DDC: > >