On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:30:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Matt Zimmerman]
> > They are all doing different things. The only common part is
> > calling dpkg-reconfigure, and I don't mind one line of duplicate
> > code in favor of adding a new init script to another package.
>
> Well,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:07:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Matt Zimmerman]
> > As discussed with Petter previously, I don't think this is the right
> > approach, and intend to maintain the existing mechanism where the
> > LTSP init script configures X. I see no reason to split this lo
[Matt Zimmerman]
> They are all doing different things. The only common part is
> calling dpkg-reconfigure, and I don't mind one line of duplicate
> code in favor of adding a new init script to another package.
Well, as I see it, they all do the same thing, but in a different way.
All of them try
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:24:21PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: xserver-common
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> When booting live CDs and thin clients, there is a need to
> (re)configure X automatically at boot time. To make this easier and
> mor
[Matt Zimmerman]
> As discussed with Petter previously, I don't think this is the right
> approach, and intend to maintain the existing mechanism where the
> LTSP init script configures X. I see no reason to split this logic
> over multiple packages.
The logic is already split across several pack
Package: xserver-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
When booting live CDs and thin clients, there is a need to
(re)configure X automatically at boot time. To make this easier and
more convenient with the normal X packages, it would be nice if an
init.d script was provi
6 matches
Mail list logo