Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 14:50 +0800, Eugene Konev a écrit :
> Can you please test if the problem still exists with the following
> libvgahw.a: http://www.imfi.kspu.ru/~ejka/libvgahw.a
This version of the library fixes the problem as well. Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 19:15:42 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > Let's hope that the GCC boys commit soon a fix to the compiler
> > (supposing
> > that they finally got consensus about this) and GCC maintainers add it
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 19:15:42 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> Let's hope that the GCC boys commit soon a fix to the compiler
> (supposing
> that they finally got consensus about this) and GCC maintainers add it to the
> current GCC suite in Debian.
>
A patch seems to have been c
El Miércoles, 20 de Julio de 2005 17:33, Eugene Konev escribió:
> Hello David.
[...]
> It seems the libvgahw.a problem can be just a part of the problem,
> though well noticeable one. Many drivers use macros like this:
>
> #define INREG(addr)*(volatile CARD32 *)(MMIOBase + (addr))
>
> And using
Hello David.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:21:45 +0200
you wrote:
> > > Enhanced version. Attached.
> >
> > Ah, I was going to upload -4 in about an hour, but if this has been
> shown
> > to work it's worth delaying the release by a day. I'll roll this in
> and
> > re-build -4 today with the fix. Great
El Miércoles, 20 de Julio de 2005 15:33, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Enhanced version. Attached.
>
> Ah, I was going to upload -4 in about an hour, but if this has been shown
> to work it's worth delaying the release by a day. I'll roll this in and
> re-build -4 today with the fix. Great work Eugen
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:59:27PM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
>
> Hello David.
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:50:28 +0200
> you wrote:
>
> > What workaround have you tried to build that libvgahw.a? No
> > optimization, or
> > an enhanced version of the X.Org patch?
>
> Enhanced version. Att
Hello David.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:50:28 +0200
you wrote:
> What workaround have you tried to build that libvgahw.a? No
> optimization, or
> an enhanced version of the X.Org patch?
Enhanced version. Attached.
gcc4 has issues with libvgahw.a. This patch is a workaround stolen from
http
El Miércoles, 20 de Julio de 2005 08:50, Eugene Konev escribió:
> Can you please test if the problem still exists with the following
> libvgahw.a: http://www.imfi.kspu.ru/~ejka/libvgahw.a
Hello, Eugene.
What workaround have you tried to build that libvgahw.a? No
optimization, or
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:50:21PM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote
>
> Can you please test if the problem still exists with the following
> libvgahw.a: http://www.imfi.kspu.ru/~ejka/libvgahw.a
>
Problem doesn't exit anymore. Thank you!
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Can you please test if the problem still exists with the following
libvgahw.a: http://www.imfi.kspu.ru/~ejka/libvgahw.a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 08:56, Guillaume Melquiond escribió:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This bug-report is related to #318218, #318231, #318271, #318405. Feel
> free to merge it with them. I didn't, becaus
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This bug-report is related to #318218, #318231, #318271, #318405. Feel
free to merge it with them. I didn't, because part of the problem
reported in these bug-reports was indeed fixed by the las
13 matches
Mail list logo
