Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2005-02-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-02-08 01:26:55 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I'm attaching the patch that Thomas Dickey has put into XTerm #200. > > I expect to include this in the next package release, and plan to > close this bug accordingly. I've just checked out xterm from the xfree86.org CVS and compiled it, and

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2005-02-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:38:09PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2005-01-11 05:15:09 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I still want to hear what Thomas Dickey as to say about this. I'm > > also not sure the semantics of selections vs. cut buffers are as you > > describe. > > I don't think th

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2005-01-11 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:00:08PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2005-01-11 05:15:09 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I still want to hear what Thomas Dickey as to say about this. I'm > > also not sure the semantics of selections vs. cut buffers are as you > > describe. > > I don't think th

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2005-01-11 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:06:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2004-12-31 04:34:13 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Well, let's call this bug what it is, then. > > > > Note that gnome-terminal isn't the only applicati

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2005-01-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-11 05:15:09 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I still want to hear what Thomas Dickey as to say about this. I'm > also not sure the semantics of selections vs. cut buffers are as you > describe. I don't think the end user should be exposed to differences between implementations (e.g. pri

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2005-01-11 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:06:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2004-12-31 04:34:13 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Well, let's call this bug what it is, then. > > Note that gnome-terminal isn't the only application that keeps the > primary selection when it is no longer highlighted. Mozi

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2004-12-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2004-12-31 04:34:13 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Well, let's call this bug what it is, then. Note that gnome-terminal isn't the only application that keeps the primary selection when it is no longer highlighted. Mozilla, Opera and Emacs all have the same behavior. And I don't think this is

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2004-12-31 Thread Branden Robinson
retitle 277832 xterm: make xterm treat the primary selection exactly as gnome-terminal does severity 277832 wishlist tag 277832 - fixed-upstream thanks On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > reopen 277832 > thanks > > I have xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9, and the problem (as d

Processed: Re: Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2004-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 277832 xterm: make xterm treat the primary selection exactly as > gnome-terminal does Bug#277832: xterm: copy/paste of non-ISO-8859-1 characters between uxterm windows malfunctions Changed Bug title. > severity 277832 wishlist Bug#277832: xte

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

2004-12-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reopen 277832 thanks I have xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9, and the problem (as described in the first message) is still there. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmeti