On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:55:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 14:30 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I apologize; I confused this bug with one you filed against
> > xserver-common. You did the right thing.
>
> Well, at least the oops is a kernel bug in my book.
Yes, bu
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 14:30 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > The EIP was generated by a binary that belonged into the
> > > > xserver-common package, so Ithought it would be re
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > The EIP was generated by a binary that belonged into the
> > > xserver-common package, so Ithought it would be reasonable.
> >
> > Which binary was that?
>
> According to the EIP I
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The EIP was generated by a binary that belonged into the
> > xserver-common package, so Ithought it would be reasonable.
>
> Which binary was that?
According to the EIP I had attached:
...
May 15 10:38:23 shawarma kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 006
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:22:50AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Have you tried going back to kernel 2.4.x?
>
> No.
Please try that.
> > (Why do you keep filing bugs specific to the XFree86 X server against
> > xserver-common? Is there a file in the xserver-common package you
> > believe t
> Have you tried going back to kernel 2.4.x?
No.
> (Why do you keep filing bugs specific to the XFree86 X server against
> xserver-common? Is there a file in the xserver-common package you
> believe to be the cause of your problems?)
The EIP was generated by a binary that belonged into the
xser
6 matches
Mail list logo
