On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:22:24PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There should probably be separate checks for libX11, libSM, libICE,
> > libXt, and so forth.
>
> If the checks should be broken up into checks for individual
> libraries that way, then is
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:32:29PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The autoconf AC_PATH_X and AC_PATH_XTRA macros think X is unavailable if
>> > only x-dev and libx11-dev are installed. In fact, autoco
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:32:29PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The autoconf AC_PATH_X and AC_PATH_XTRA macros think X is unavailable if
> > only x-dev and libx11-dev are installed. In fact, autoconf thinks
> > they're missing *even if* you specify
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The autoconf AC_PATH_X and AC_PATH_XTRA macros think X is unavailable if
> only x-dev and libx11-dev are installed. In fact, autoconf thinks
> they're missing *even if* you specify --x-includes and --x-libraries
> arguments to configure.
>
> This is
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:14:08AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Package: xlibs-dev
> Version: 4.3.0-3
>
> Hello,
>
> the xlibs-dev package comment states it to be a transitional
> package, but I cannot remove it, because it circular depends
> back on itself:
>
> xlibs-dev depends on l
Package: xlibs-dev
Version: 4.3.0-3
Hello,
the xlibs-dev package comment states it to be a transitional
package, but I cannot remove it, because it circular depends
back on itself:
xlibs-dev depends on libxrandr-dev
libxrandr-dev depends on libxrender-dev
libxrender-dev depends on xlibs-dev
I c
6 matches
Mail list logo
