On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:49:39AM +0100, Jens Nachtigall wrote:
> I totally agree with this point. I, for instance, did not even now that
> the 10X in pc10X stands for the number of keys up to now. And how can I
> now, if the debconf description is such a bad help. The description by
> debconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > I live in Germany. It might be a mistery to you, but that is not
> > surprising.
>
> [...]
>
> Huh? I had no offense in mind,
Hi Denis,
Sorry, I definitely did not take your response as an offence. Sorry, if
mine sounded a bit harsh
:-)
Kind
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 08:18:09PM +0100, Jens Nachtigall wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > > QUOTE
> > > The "pc104" keyboard is like the pc101 model, with additional keys.
> > > These keys are usually engraved with a "logo" symbol (there is
> > > typically a pair of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > QUOTE
> > The "pc104" keyboard is like the pc101 model, with additional keys.
> > These keys are usually engraved with a "logo" symbol (there is
> > typically a pair of these, between each set of control and alt
> > keys), and a "menu" key.
> > .
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:49:39AM +0100, Jens Nachtigall wrote:
[...]
> I totally agree with this point. I, for instance, did not even now that
> the 10X in pc10X stands for the number of keys up to now. And how can I
> now, if the debconf description is such a bad help. The description by
> de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> 4.3.0-3 will announce this change in the NEWS file, and the debconf
>> template description for this question has been expanded to spell out
>> exactly what will go wrong if you pick "pc101" or "pc104" for your
>> keyboard model when you really need
6 matches
Mail list logo