As somebody already stated in another thread. You don't have to use
packaged netscape which is known to have security issues. You can
install latest netscape in /usr/local/ without need of obsolete
dependecies.
> Many other browsers do also, but this doesn't fix that broken website. Trust
> me,
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> For me it is: well, there are some websites I have to
>> look at with netscape since mozilla doesnt display
>> them (same for the submitter, if I understand him right);
>> and I lik
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:35:41PM +0200, Martin-=EF=BF=BDric Racine wrote:
> > Package: xlib6g
> > Version: 4.2.1-3
> > Severity: normal
> >=20
> > I have an old Netscape 4.77 dating back from Potato that I absolutely
> > need to access cer
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> [...]
>> > The question is: Since the last xlib6g packages are empty packages
>> > anyways... do you really need to Conflict: it?
>>
>> I'd really like to force them off the system.
>
> Could conflicting with xlib6g less-than say 4.3.0 help in
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 08:53:05AM +1100, Neale Banks wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > The question is: Since the last xlib6g packages are empty packages
> > > anyways... do you really need to Conflict: it?
> >
> > I'd really like to force them off the system.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> For me it is: well, there are some websites I have to
> look at with netscape since mozilla doesnt display
> them (same for the submitter, if I understand him right);
> and I like xv :)
Neither netscape nor xv were *ever*
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:38:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > There is no other chance currently, than repackage any package that
> > depends on xlib6g currently with modified control file.
>
> I'd really like to fo
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
> > The question is: Since the last xlib6g packages are empty packages
> > anyways... do you really need to Conflict: it?
>
> I'd really like to force them off the system.
Could conflicting with xlib6g less-than say 4.3.0 help in getting us to a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 233818
Bug#233818: xlibs: please provide xlib6g
Bug#233867: "Provides: xlib6g" needed in 4.3.0
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reopen 233818
thanks
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > You may be able to rectify your problem, however, by using the "equivs"
>
> Well, the problem is: as long as you Conflict: xlib6g in xlibs, nobody
> will be able to install any package that even just
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:16:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:35:41PM +0200, Martin-???ric Racine wrote:
> > I have an old Netscape 4.77 dating back from Potato that I absolutely
> >
> > Alternately, if some existing 4.3.0 packages are supposed to
> > "Provides: xl
Package: xlib6g
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
I have an old Netscape 4.77 dating back from Potato that I absolutely need to
access certain sites that refuse to work
with Mozilla or even Opera. Unfortunately, it is dependant upon xlib6g, which
seems to be absent in XFree86 4.3.0.
Luckily,
12 matches
Mail list logo
