Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:59:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Shouldn't we start with the minimum required to build drivers, and add > more as the need arises? And you will provide the patch for it ? Friendly, Sven Luther

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
[ I followed up to the OpenGL related problem to bug #218823 ] On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:42, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrot

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500,

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I like to test my packages before uploa

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Why should the DDK be restricted to only some architectures? > > > > Because the SDK is 170Mo

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:29:06AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:07:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Keep in mind, though, that the SDK/DDK package is a post-4.3.0-1 issue. > > Ok too, as long as it can be released with sarge. You should know better than to try to

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Why should the DDK be restricted to only some architectures? > > Because the SDK is 170Mo big, and the resulting tarball is 50Mo big, and > since it is bzip2ed, it w

Re: Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 12:04:46PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote: > For the sake of perhaps shortening the discussion I will insert a > description, as I understand it. > > * prescriptive > a variable you set manually before starting to build to change the way > the build runs. A nice example i

Re: Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: >> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: [...] >> > No, I don't have a DONT_BUILD_SERVER option.

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-03 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:07:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:51:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I guess you decided to ignore my reply to you on debian-x. :( > > > > Huh ? Didn't see any r

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-03 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > No, I don't have a DONT_BUILD_SERVER option. As I've explained on this > > > list before, the variables are called NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER and > > > NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER, and they are *descriptive*, not > > > *prescriptive*.

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-02 Thread Branden Robinson
[redirecting this debian-x discussion to your bug report] On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Ok, here attached is what i think a fina

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:51:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I guess you decided to ignore my reply to you on debian-x. :( > > Huh ? Didn't see any reply on debian-x, at least not prior to writting > this mail, and i _do_ rea

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:51:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Ok, here attached is what i think a final version of the driver sdk. The > > only remaining thing is to attach some documentation in the > > README.Debian file, but i

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Ok, here attached is what i think a final version of the driver sdk. The > only remaining thing is to attach some documentation in the > README.Debian file, but i will first need to actually use the package to > build some drivers befor