Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>> On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 17:40:26 -0400 (EDT), >> Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Wouldn't it be better to have a temporary back-compatibility > package for the old flex as a stop-gap measure so things could > progress on other fronts while the lex stuff was sorted out? One

Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Manoj, Wouldn't it be better to have a temporary back-compatibility package for the old flex as a stop-gap measure so things could progress on other fronts while the lex stuff was sorted out? Jack

Processed: Re: Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 188665 -1 -2 Bug#188665: flex: new upstream release breaks builds Bug 188665 cloned as bugs 188876-188877. > reassign -1 binutils Bug#188876: flex: new upstream release breaks builds Bug reassigned from package `flex' to `binutils'. > reassign -