> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2) Defined `BuildServersOnly' will build only X servers.
>>`Servers' mean `XFree86 server, Xnest server, X virtual fareme
>>buffer server, and Xprint server'.
>>
>> The Xnest server requires libX11, s
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This fix is not enough for these bug reports?
>>
>> It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to
>> compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the
>> headers. Howeve
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2) Defined `BuildServersOnly' will build only X servers.
>>`Servers' mean `XFree86 server, Xnest server, X virtual fareme
>>buffer server, and Xprint server'.
>>
>> The Xnest server requires libX11, s
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This fix is not enough for these bug reports?
>>
>> It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to
>> compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the
>> headers. Howeve
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:17:50AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers
> out of the source tree.
Right.
> Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed.
Nor should it ever be. Source packages that Build-Depend on themselves
are stup
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:17:50AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers
> out of the source tree.
Right.
> Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed.
Nor should it ever be. Source packages that Build-Depend on themselves
are stup
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here is a patch for #170508, #170510.
>>
>> Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way
>> but I wa
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for #170508, #170510.
Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way
but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead.
Oh well, that's upstream's problem, I gu
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here is a patch for #170508, #170510.
>>
>> Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way
>> but I wa
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for #170508, #170510.
Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way
but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead.
Oh well, that's upstream's problem, I gu
Hi,
Here is a patch for #170508, #170510.
1) #170508
GLX library links libX11 and libXext like this:
gcc -o ./libGL.so.1.2~ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,-soname,libGL.so.1
../../../lib/GL/glx/clientattrib.o ../../../lib/GL/glx/compsize.o
../../../lib/GL/glx/dispatch.o ../../../lib/GL/glx/ev
Hi,
Here is a patch for #170508, #170510.
1) #170508
GLX library links libX11 and libXext like this:
gcc -o ./libGL.so.1.2~ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,-soname,libGL.so.1
../../../lib/GL/glx/clientattrib.o ../../../lib/GL/glx/compsize.o
../../../lib/GL/glx/dispatch.o ../../../lib/GL/glx/ev
12 matches
Mail list logo
