On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Yann Bloch wrote:
> Without anti-aliasing, bitmap fonts look much better than scalable
> fonts. So I could solve the problem by putting the Type1 fonts after the
> 75/100dpi in the "catalogue" variable of the config file.
That's what I've done.
> Maybe th
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Yann Bloch wrote:
> Without anti-aliasing, bitmap fonts look much better than scalable
> fonts. So I could solve the problem by putting the Type1 fonts after the
> 75/100dpi in the "catalogue" variable of the config file.
That's what I've done.
> Maybe th
Hello!
In the new version of /etc/X11/fs/config, the content of the "catalogue"
variable has changed. The unscaled fonts (100dpi and 75dpi) used to be
declared before the Type1 (scalable) fonts. Now it's the contrary.
When looking for a font family (eg Helvetica) XFS seems to take the
first "font
Hello!
In the new version of /etc/X11/fs/config, the content of the "catalogue"
variable has changed. The unscaled fonts (100dpi and 75dpi) used to be
declared before the Type1 (scalable) fonts. Now it's the contrary.
When looking for a font family (eg Helvetica) XFS seems to take the
first "font
4 matches
Mail list logo
