Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> >
> > What I did was as follows (from memory - I may have a filename or two
> > wrong, as I'm not at the relevant machine right now. Later this evening
> > I can post a full log):
> >
> > # apt-get build-dep xserver-xfree86
> > # apt-get source xse
Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> >
> > What I did was as follows (from memory - I may have a filename or two
> > wrong, as I'm not at the relevant machine right now. Later this evening
> > I can post a full log):
> >
> > # apt-get build-dep xserver-xfree86
> > # apt-get source xs
Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> What I did was as follows (from memory - I may have a filename or two
> wrong, as I'm not at the relevant machine right now. Later this evening
> I can post a full log):
>
> # apt-get build-dep xserver-xfree86
> # apt-get source xserver-xfree86
> # cvs -r xf-4_0_99_1 co
Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> What I did was as follows (from memory - I may have a filename or two
> wrong, as I'm not at the relevant machine right now. Later this evening
> I can post a full log):
>
> # apt-get build-dep xserver-xfree86
> # apt-get source xserver-xfree86
> # cvs -r xf-4_0_99_1 co
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:05:49AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> But then my system at home is a wild mixture of potato/woody and lots of
> selfbuilt packages (glibc, xfree).
Exctly... the HOWTO explains exactly (and in small steps) how to build
the 4.0.2 packages on a _stock_ potato s
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:56:59AM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. There are regular howtos on how to
> build the 4.0.2 packages, both on potato and on unstable, but I haven't
Are these howtos still needed? I built 4.0.2-4 at home without build
trouble (dpkg-build
Gordon Sadler wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > The build works for a while (a bunch of patches fail, but some of them
> > succeed, and it gets into the build part of the process), but fails when
> > trying to run (I think):
> > bison -y -d pswparser.y
"Charl P. Botha" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
> > people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
> > out without any resolution most of the time.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:05:49AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> But then my system at home is a wild mixture of potato/woody and lots of
> selfbuilt packages (glibc, xfree).
Exctly... the HOWTO explains exactly (and in small steps) how to build
the 4.0.2 packages on a _stock_ potato
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:56:59AM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. There are regular howtos on how to
> build the 4.0.2 packages, both on potato and on unstable, but I haven't
Are these howtos still needed? I built 4.0.2-4 at home without build
trouble (dpkg-buil
Gordon Sadler wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > The build works for a while (a bunch of patches fail, but some of them
> > succeed, and it gets into the build part of the process), but fails when
> > trying to run (I think):
> > bison -y -d pswparser.y
"Charl P. Botha" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
> > people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
> > out without any resolution most of the time.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
> people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
> out without any resolution most of the time.
Oh? They peter out do they? I seem to
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
> people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
> out without any resolution most of the time.
Oh? They peter out do they? I seem t
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
> people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
> out without any resolution most of the time.
>
> I'm in the same situation as others
I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
out without any resolution most of the time.
I'm in the same situation as others who want to do this - a couple of
bugs/features are in the latest 4.0.99.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
> people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
> out without any resolution most of the time.
>
> I'm in the same situation as other
I've just joined this list, but I see a few times in the archives that
people have tried to build their own X debs. These threads seem to peter
out without any resolution most of the time.
I'm in the same situation as others who want to do this - a couple of
bugs/features are in the latest 4.0.99
18 matches
Mail list logo
