On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:34:19PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Anyway, like i said, i am in no hurry for it, just wanted to discuss it, since
> this nobody is needing 4.0 stuff, is not exactly true ...
Please indicate to me where I said anything like "nobody needs 4.0".
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:05:59PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > What is wrong with making a debian 4.0 package, and put it in experimental
> > (i
> > did not say woody, i know you have problems with upgrading unstable).
> >
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> What is wrong with making a debian 4.0 package, and put it in experimental (i
> did not say woody, i know you have problems with upgrading unstable).
>
> Debian 2.2 user are using potato, which comes with 3.3.6-whatever and should
> w
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:46:25AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > What is wrong with making a debian 4.0 package, and put it in experimental
> > (i
> > did not say woody, i know you have problems with upgrading unstable).
>
> If
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:46:25AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Also you tell you will be repackaging X from a clean start, care
> > to explain a bit what you have planned to do, and how we can help
> > in this process ?
>
> Writing all this up takes time, too. I've already written one m
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> What is wrong with making a debian 4.0 package, and put it in experimental (i
> did not say woody, i know you have problems with upgrading unstable).
If I happen to get such a thing done soon, I may do so.
> Debian 2.2 user are using
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 03:41:22PM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:30:49PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Branden, i understand Xfree packaging is a big chunk of work, but would it
> > not
> > be easier if there was some kind of cvs repository of the packaging stuff,
> > and
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 03:48:46PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:30:49PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > but remember there are people who are working on Xfree driver or such that
> > would like to have a working debian packaging, ...
>
> remember that there are people
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:30:49PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Branden, i understand Xfree packaging is a big chunk of work, but would it not
> be easier if there was some kind of cvs repository of the packaging stuff, and
> you would post the ideas you had for the new XF4.x packages, and that othe
> There will be no 4.0.0 .debs. 4.0.1 is expected in mid-June, and I
> plan to package that.
"Yay!" I say.
/me is bouncing on the walls about Overfiend taking the no-nonsense
approach to this...
M.
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:30:49PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> but remember there are people who are working on Xfree driver or such that
> would like to have a working debian packaging, ...
remember that there are people who are going to be using Debian 2.2 or such
that would like to have a worki
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 08:52:35PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO THE LISTS, AND NOT MY MAILBOX. DO NOT FILE BUG REPORTS
> ABOUT THIS, EITHER; THERE IS ALREADY A BUG FILED ABOUT A NEW UPSTREAM
> VERSION OF X.
>
> Okay, with that out of the way...
>
> There will be no 4.0.0 .deb
PLEASE REPLY TO THE LISTS, AND NOT MY MAILBOX. DO NOT FILE BUG REPORTS
ABOUT THIS, EITHER; THERE IS ALREADY A BUG FILED ABOUT A NEW UPSTREAM
VERSION OF X.
Okay, with that out of the way...
There will be no 4.0.0 .debs. 4.0.1 is expected in mid-June, and I plan to
package that. Why?
1) Real-wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
