On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 10:16:49PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Josip had expressed his intention to rename xpm4g to libxpm and more
> specifically, he had expressed his intention to do it smoothly:
>
> | xpm (3.4k-2) unstable; urgency=low
> |
> | * Following Joel Klecker's example (
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 10:16:49PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Josip had expressed his intention to rename xpm4g to libxpm and more
> specifically, he had expressed his intention to do it smoothly:
>
> | xpm (3.4k-2) unstable; urgency=low
> |
> | * Following Joel Klecker's example
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:11:19PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Let this serve as a wake-up call to recalcitrant package
> maintainers.
ROTFLMAOL!
> I NMU'ed 4 packages myself to modernize them WRT the xpm
> dependency, and only one (fvwm
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:11:19PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> But surely having xlibs Provide: xpm4g (at least for a while, until all
> dependancies on xpm4g have been fixed to libxpm4) will make the upgrade
> path that much easier ... at the moment a number of packages still depend
> on xpm4g s
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:11:19PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Let this serve as a wake-up call to recalcitrant package
> maintainers.
ROTFLMAOL!
> I NMU'ed 4 packages myself to modernize them WRT the xpm
> dependency, and only one (fvw
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 11:42:28AM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:33:56AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> > Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having
> > problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so
> > some of thes
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:11:19PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> But surely having xlibs Provide: xpm4g (at least for a while, until all
> dependancies on xpm4g have been fixed to libxpm4) will make the upgrade
> path that much easier ... at the moment a number of packages still depend
> on xpm4g
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 11:42:28AM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:33:56AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> > Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having
> > problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so
> > some of the
>> Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xpm4g is so old and out of date that it shouldn't be poerpetuated
I really fail to understand your fixation on this (non-)issue.
Josip had expressed his intention to rename xpm4g to libxpm and more
specifically, he had expressed his intention t
>> Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xpm4g is so old and out of date that it shouldn't be poerpetuated
I really fail to understand your fixation on this (non-)issue.
Josip had expressed his intention to rename xpm4g to libxpm and more
specifically, he had expressed his intention
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:33:56AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having
> problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so
> some of these problems could be fixed by making xlibs provide xpm4g.
> This won't wo
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:33:56AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having
> problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so
> some of these problems could be fixed by making xlibs provide xpm4g.
> This won't w
[please CC all replies to me, I'm not on -x]
Sorry, I posted this to Branden last time, so after seeing his changelog
comment, thought I'd better post it to the list :)
- Forwarded message from Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:45:46 +1100
From: Timshel Knoll <
[please CC all replies to me, I'm not on -x]
Sorry, I posted this to Branden last time, so after seeing his changelog
comment, thought I'd better post it to the list :)
- Forwarded message from Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:45:46 +1100
From: Timshel Knoll
14 matches
Mail list logo
