Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for confirming these changes, Adam. Once we've slain the XKB beast,
> (or at least tiptoed around it carefully) dexconf should be pretty nice for
> SPARC users.
Excellent. Sorry I can't give you the proper XKB info you need.
Sorry I keep co
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for confirming these changes, Adam. Once we've slain the XKB beast,
> (or at least tiptoed around it carefully) dexconf should be pretty nice for
> SPARC users.
Excellent. Sorry I can't give you the proper XKB info you need.
Sorry I keep c
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:25:22AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
> file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
> had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
> a patch
Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
a patch to dexter, but I'm afraid I have neither.
Summary:
- need dexter op
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:25:22AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
> file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
> had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
> a patch
Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
a patch to dexter, but I'm afraid I have neither.
Summary:
- need dexter o
6 matches
Mail list logo