On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Simon Kongshoj wrote:
> > Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
>
> No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
> didn't set the value right. :)
Me too, but the card did have trouble once in that time... had to replace
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Simon Kongshoj wrote:
> > Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
>
> No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
> didn't set the value right. :)
Me too, but the card did have trouble once in that time... had to replace
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin bashed his keyboard into the wall and
hit the folllowing keys:
> Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
didn't set the value right. :)
--
Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - h
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin bashed his keyboard into the wall and
hit the folllowing keys:
> Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
didn't set the value right. :)
--
Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Simon Kongshoj wrote:
> I've never tried this myself though -- I have only one monitor hooked to
> my own G400 MAX, and I have been using X 3.3.6 for some time now
[...]
> Speaking of G400 MAX cards -- XF86 (at least in the versions I have tried)
> sets the
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Simon Kongshoj wrote:
> I've never tried this myself though -- I have only one monitor hooked to
> my own G400 MAX, and I have been using X 3.3.6 for some time now
[...]
> Speaking of G400 MAX cards -- XF86 (at least in the versions I have tried)
> sets th
6 matches
Mail list logo