Re: [i915 x.org patch] suppress debugging spewage on non-i386

2005-07-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I like the patch, and I would No problem; it's perfectly understandable given that the audit was still going on the first time around (and rightly took priority). > like to roll it in to the first round of pac

Re: [i915 x.org patch] suppress debugging spewage on non-i386

2005-07-08 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:11:40PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Now that the patch audit is complete (yay!) and I've had more time to > test the driver (mostly via xscreensaver hacks ;-)), I would like to > resubmit the following patch; as far as I can tell, there's really no > need for such debug

Re: [i915 x.org patch] suppress debugging spewage on non-i386

2005-07-08 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Now that the patch audit is complete (yay!) and I've had more time to test the driver (mostly via xscreensaver hacks ;-)), I would like to resubmit the following patch; as far as I can tell, there's really no need for such debugging, particularly not mandatorily. As it stands

[i915 x.org patch] suppress debugging spewage on non-i386

2005-07-01 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
As it stands, attempting to use the i915 DRI driver on non-i386 hardware (such as my EM64T system or perhaps certain ia64 systems) produces a flood of debugging output on standard error, making the driver relatively useless for practical purposes. The patch below, stolen from Mesa's trunk, disable