Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-26 Thread Andreas Fuchs
On 2000-10-25, Scott Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would anyone read that message? It's a full page of all-caps > shouting. It looks just like a EULA, and who reads those? Something > like this would probably work better... > - I recognize that these are development packages,

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-26 Thread Andreas Fuchs
On 2000-10-25, Scott Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would anyone read that message? It's a full page of all-caps > shouting. It looks just like a EULA, and who reads those? Something > like this would probably work better... > - I recognize that these are development packages,

OT: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Benedikt Spranger
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > ... [Branden, perhaps you should > change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me > God". :] Please do not! We have the debian-XF4 installed at nearly 10 computers in our student home. Every thing works fine, so we have to give

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Scott Bronson
> Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that > already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? Why would anyone read that message? It's a full page of all-caps shouting. It looks just like a EULA, and who reads those? Something like this would probably work better...

OT: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Benedikt Spranger
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > ... [Branden, perhaps you should > change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me > God". :] Please do not! We have the debian-XF4 installed at nearly 10 computers in our student home. Every thing works fine, so we have to giv

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Scott Bronson
> Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that > already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? Why would anyone read that message? It's a full page of all-caps shouting. It looks just like a EULA, and who reads those? Something like this would probably work better...

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001025 00:06]: > > And phase 3? > NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. Heh, you are making changes faster than I can download and test them! :) BTW -- nice work with it all. :) -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we'r

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:07:21PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001024 21:47]: > > We're getting close to 4.0.1-1. That message had to come out sometime. > > And phase 3? NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. -- G. Branden Robinson

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001025 00:06]: > > And phase 3? > NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. Heh, you are making changes faster than I can download and test them! :) BTW -- nice work with it all. :) -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we'

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001024 21:47]: > We're getting close to 4.0.1-1. That message had to come out sometime. And phase 3? -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really impressed down here, I can tell you.''

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:07:21PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001024 21:47]: > > We're getting close to 4.0.1-1. That message had to come out sometime. > > And phase 3? NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. -- G. Branden Robinson

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:07:54PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: > Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that > already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? [Branden, perhaps you should > change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me > God". :] We're ge

[branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-24 Thread Seth Arnold
Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? [Branden, perhaps you should change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me God". :] To answer your direct question, GLU will be supported once upstream supports

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-24 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001024 21:47]: > We're getting close to 4.0.1-1. That message had to come out sometime. And phase 3? -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really impressed down here, I can tell you.'' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:07:54PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: > Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that > already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? [Branden, perhaps you should > change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me > God". :] We're g

[branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-24 Thread Seth Arnold
Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? [Branden, perhaps you should change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me God". :] To answer your direct question, GLU will be supported once upstream supports