El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 23:25, Mattia Dongili escribió:
> I see, This makes a good enough point :) But I'm now wondering if it's
> still worth changing the name, my first intent is to make clear that
> the new package is not an xfree86 only driver as the name suggests.
> I'd probably need to t
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:59:48PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >Why not dropping the "f86" part at all?
> I believe this is because the drivers use the "xfree86 DDX", or something
> like
> that. (Because they don't work with the xnest, darwin, vfb, dmx, cygwin,
> kdrive, etc. versions of t
>Why not dropping the "f86" part at all?
I believe this is because the drivers use the "xfree86 DDX", or something like
that. (Because they don't work with the xnest, darwin, vfb, dmx, cygwin,
kdrive, etc. versions of the X server.) They are located in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86, even in t
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:27:34AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > Hello XFS and other readers (like me).
> >
> > I'm working on the transition of the xfree86-driver-synaptics toward the
> > new XOrg packages and they will closely follow the same route of the
> > XOrg
Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hello XFS and other readers (like me).
>
> I'm working on the transition of the xfree86-driver-synaptics toward the
> new XOrg packages and they will closely follow the same route of the
> XOrg packages.
> They are available at:
> http://people.debian.org/~malattia/de
Hello XFS and other readers (like me).
I'm working on the transition of the xfree86-driver-synaptics toward the
new XOrg packages and they will closely follow the same route of the
XOrg packages.
They are available at:
http://people.debian.org/~malattia/debian
or for the impatients:
deb
6 matches
Mail list logo