On 05-Sep-23 14:03, Sven Luther wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Please do not start the naming debate for the ppc64 port again.
> > This has been discussed and decided months ago.
>
> Decided ? i don't think i was part of this discussion, and with the ppc/ppc64
> kernel upstream thingy chang
On 05-Sep-23 13:16, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andreas
> > > Jochens has done it, and if multi-arch ever becomes really usable
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:06:22PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Sep-23 13:16, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andrea
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andreas
> > Jochens has done it, and if multi-arch ever becomes really usable, then
> > another approach would be needed, in
On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andreas
> Jochens has done it, and if multi-arch ever becomes really usable, then
> another approach would be needed, in the meantime, the biarch is support we
> will have for etch.
'xorg-x11'
5 matches
Mail list logo
