This has actually been going on for a couple months. I've swapped out
window manager and display manager, ditching gnome for the time being. As
far as I can recall, stability was fine during -phase1.
Hardware configuration:
Dual P200mmx on a piix3 chipset(430HX), APICs enabled. Video:
00:0a.0 VGA
This has actually been going on for a couple months. I've swapped out
window manager and display manager, ditching gnome for the time being. As
far as I can recall, stability was fine during -phase1.
Hardware configuration:
Dual P200mmx on a piix3 chipset(430HX), APICs enabled. Video:
00:0a.0 VG
I may set up a second machine just for testing.
So far, the mouse chooser can still use a few more defined devices. The
default mouse type for /dev/gpmdata should be IntelliMouse as far as I
know. What's the default mouse type for USB? is HID mouse all one protocol
according to the mouse driver, o
I may set up a second machine just for testing.
So far, the mouse chooser can still use a few more defined devices. The
default mouse type for /dev/gpmdata should be IntelliMouse as far as I
know. What's the default mouse type for USB? is HID mouse all one protocol
according to the mouse driver,
I don't believe one of the immediate goals of dexter is to support
multiple anything yet, but give it time.
Drifting a little bit from topic, I'm thinking it would be nice to have a
seperate user-mode input manager, that can communicate and pass input
events across network connections. It should
I don't believe one of the immediate goals of dexter is to support
multiple anything yet, but give it time.
Drifting a little bit from topic, I'm thinking it would be nice to have a
seperate user-mode input manager, that can communicate and pass input
events across network connections. It should
I hadn't extensively played with it either, since I have a rather custom
config (dual head with fixed-frequency monitors).
Though, it would be nice if dexter could accept more monitor information,
perhaps even a full XFree86 modeline. Hopefully that kind of additional
support could be added later
I hadn't extensively played with it either, since I have a rather custom
config (dual head with fixed-frequency monitors).
Though, it would be nice if dexter could accept more monitor information,
perhaps even a full XFree86 modeline. Hopefully that kind of additional
support could be added later
/dev/gpmdata is not on the list of mouse devices. /dev/gpmdata IS a valid
mouse device.
/dev/gpmdata is not on the list of mouse devices. /dev/gpmdata IS a valid
mouse device.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000925 08:51]:
> > > Use +xinerama.
> >
> > No can do, unless one of you guys can figure out how to do xinerama
> > between a colour display and a greyscale display. ;)
>
> Very simple -- make the color displa
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000925 08:51]:
> > > Use +xinerama.
> >
> > No can do, unless one of you guys can figure out how to do xinerama
> > between a colour display and a greyscale display. ;)
>
> Very simple -- make the color displ
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:59:58AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I recently opened a bug against fvwm describing the observed misbehaviour
> > but I'd like to get a little bit of a feel for what other multihead X
> > users are using for window m
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:59:58AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I recently opened a bug against fvwm describing the observed misbehaviour
> > but I'd like to get a little bit of a feel for what other multihead X
> > users are using for window
Recently I decided I wanted to have a button bar with a clock and the
pager in it on my primary display, and while configuring it I discovered
that I had two instances of FvwmIconMan and FvwmPager on each of my two
heads. It seems from the way fvwm loads, that it is spawning another
instance of it
Recently I decided I wanted to have a button bar with a clock and the
pager in it on my primary display, and while configuring it I discovered
that I had two instances of FvwmIconMan and FvwmPager on each of my two
heads. It seems from the way fvwm loads, that it is spawning another
instance of i
Okay, so if I want to use xinerama, I'll want some help comfiguring my
second display for something more than 8bpp, since the second head is a
greyscale monitor. Currently :0.0 is an 8MB card displaying at
1280x1024-16, and :0.1 is a 4MB card displaying at 1600x1200-8.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Jacob K
Okay, so if I want to use xinerama, I'll want some help comfiguring my
second display for something more than 8bpp, since the second head is a
greyscale monitor. Currently :0.0 is an 8MB card displaying at
1280x1024-16, and :0.1 is a 4MB card displaying at 1600x1200-8.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Jacob
I'm running X in dual display mode with fvwm2 as window manager. I'd like
to move windows from :0.0 to :0.1, so that the application owning the
windows will be displaying on both displays.
I'm running X in dual display mode with fvwm2 as window manager. I'd like
to move windows from :0.0 to :0.1, so that the application owning the
windows will be displaying on both displays.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
ATI [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Matrox Millenium II. I suppose openGL will have to
wait probably until Utah-GLX gets ported up to 4.0.x
Kernel is 2.2.17 with USB backport, compiled Fri Aug 4. And of course
-test6 and Potato's modutils don't get along. I upgraded the machine I
have running test6 to Wood
ATI Xpert98@work and Matrox Millenium II. I suppose openGL will have to
wait probably until Utah-GLX gets ported up to 4.0.x
Kernel is 2.2.17 with USB backport, compiled Fri Aug 4. And of course
-test6 and Potato's modutils don't get along. I upgraded the machine I
have running test6 to Woody's
v11 has been performing adequately for me. I'm probably going to wait a
little while before updating.
Anyway, Spener,
Don't use dselect to remove the debs. Make a list of all X packages with
the correct version number (3.3.6 | 4.0.1), and then use dpkg from a shell
to do the removal. 'dpkg --purg
v11 has been performing adequately for me. I'm probably going to wait a
little while before updating.
Anyway, Spener,
Don't use dselect to remove the debs. Make a list of all X packages with
the correct version number (3.3.6 | 4.0.1), and then use dpkg from a shell
to do the removal. 'dpkg --pur
I was getting a 'X: /etc/X11/Xserver not configured' error when running
'xinit' or 'X' directly, yet 'xf86cfg' was able to initialise.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Derek J Witt wrote:
> Yeah, xf86cfg dies on me,too. But I got it to work by switching to the
> console. and doing this:
>
> export DISPLAY=:
I was getting a 'X: /etc/X11/Xserver not configured' error when running
'xinit' or 'X' directly, yet 'xf86cfg' was able to initialise.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Derek J Witt wrote:
> Yeah, xf86cfg dies on me,too. But I got it to work by switching to the
> console. and doing this:
>
> export DISPLAY=
26 matches
Mail list logo
