mesa_24.2.0~rc3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

... as requested on IRC Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. pgpuMMlU4GGdI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Comments regarding libei_1.0.901-1_amd64.changes

Hi Jeremy, I marked the package for ACCEPT, but I wonder why you are so reluctant to add an entry for debian/* in your debian/copyright? Thorsten

mesa-amber_21.3.9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please also mention mesa-amber-21.3.9/src/imgui/LICENSE.txt mesa-amber-21.3.9/src/imgui/imstb_rectpack.h in your debian/coypright. Further some Khronos files, parts of include/CL and include/android* seem to be available under a Apache license. Also the file LICENSE.txt which is r

weston_11.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Hector, can you please upload to experimental? Thanks! Thorsten [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/01/msg00040.html [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected,

mesa-amber_21.3.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention the files that are licensed under GPL-2 or MIT, GPL-1+, GPL-2 in your debian/copyright. Please also mention at least: Zoltan Gilian Igalia S.L Dylan Baker There might be more missing. While you are at it please also take care of the lintian Errors and Warnings. Th

xwayland_21.1.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please mention all licenses and copyright holder. For example the BSD license is missing and the Open Grou, DEC and numerous others as well ... While you are at it, please take care of the lintian errors. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

libxcvt_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please also mention Graham Loveridge in your debian/copyright. Also please take care of the lintian errors and warnings. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address ou

Re: renderdoc_1.9+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jordan, On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Jordan Justen wrote: please also mention all copyright holder and license information of the swig tarball to your debian/copyright. debian/copyright has two related sections: swig/* swig/vs2015/pcre/* Did I miss something, or is the format incorrect? the f

renderdoc_1.9+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jordan, please also mention all copyright holder and license information of the swig tarball to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our co

renderdoc_1.9+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

"I mistakenly uploaded renderdoc 1.9+dfsg-3 for unstable rather than experimental." === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

libglvnd_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please mention all files under the Apache license in your debian/copyright. While you are at it please also mention the GPL license and the copyright holders of the toc generator in userguide.html Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understa

mesa_18.2.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

mesa_18.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please update your debian/coypright and mention at least all files under the Apache license. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

mesa_18.2.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

xorgproto_2018.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please mention * SGI FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE B (Version 2.0, Sept. 18, 2008) in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, please also take care of: E: xorgproto source: no-human-maintainers W: xorgproto source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: xorgproto source: source-nmu-has-incorr

Re: Comments regarding libglvnd_0.2.999+git20170201-2_amd64.changes

Hi Andreas, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Andreas Boll wrote: what's the status of getting libglvnd accepted? it is still stuck due to the missing dependencies. If there’s anything we can do to help, please let us know. Do you have any idea how to solve that? Thorsten

Re: Comments regarding libglvnd_0.2.999+git20170201-2_amd64.changes

On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 06.04.2017 21:10, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi Andreas, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Andreas Boll wrote: what's the status of getting libglvnd accepted? it is still stuck due to the missing dependencies. If there’s anything we can do to help, p

Comments regarding libglvnd_0.2.999+git20170201-2_amd64.changes

Hi Timo, can you please tell me where I can find the dependency: libglx-mesa0 | libglx-vendor Thanks! Thorsten

Re: libxfont_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Julien, On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Julien Cristau wrote: unless there is no new consent found in #798476, the policy is still valid and I have to reject your package: E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers No, you very much don't "have to". That lintian warning doesn't make the package unsuit

libxfont_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, unless there is no new consent found in #798476, the policy is still valid and I have to reject your package: E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

libxfont_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, can you please take care of: E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

vulkan_1.0.3.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, please mention the license of vulkan-1.0.3.1+dfsg1/buildAndroid/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

libxpresent_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to policy 5.6.3 there must be an Uploaders: field in your package. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Re: squeeze update of libxfont?

Hi Julien, On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Julien Cristau wrote: I'd rather let you handle it, though I can probably review a backport of the patches if necessary. I just took the patches from the Wheezy upload, so they should be ok ... Thorsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.deb

libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by mlankhorst === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

xserver-xorg-video-freedreno_1.2.0-1_armhf.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please put all licenses/copyright information of all files inside the source tarball into your debian/copyright. For example entries for: system-includes/linux/msm_mdp.h src/msm-dri2.c src/drmmode_display.c src/compat-api.h