Re: [offtopic] G400 RAMDAC speed setting

2000-09-25 Thread Simon Kongshoj
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin bashed his keyboard into the wall and hit the folllowing keys: > Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way? No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it didn't set the value right. :) -- Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL P

Re: [offtopic] G400 RAMDAC speed setting

2000-09-25 Thread Simon Kongshoj
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin bashed his keyboard into the wall and hit the folllowing keys: > Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way? No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it didn't set the value right. :) -- Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL P

Re: DPMS

2000-09-19 Thread Simon Kongshoj
(at 300 MHz, the correct value for non-MAX G400s). I recently tried using (in the 'device' section of XF86Config) a 'dacspeed 360' line to get the G400MAX's DAC up to its intended value -- works perfectly. In some versions of X it will probably be 'Option "

Re: DPMS

2000-09-19 Thread Simon Kongshoj
(at 300 MHz, the correct value for non-MAX G400s). I recently tried using (in the 'device' section of XF86Config) a 'dacspeed 360' line to get the G400MAX's DAC up to its intended value -- works perfectly. In some versions of X it will probably be 'Option "

Re: DPMS

2000-09-18 Thread Simon Kongshoj
icitly in the XF86Config file to get DPMS. IIRC, you need a line called 'Option "DPMS"' in the Monitor section. -- Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cs.auc.dk/~simon Why have your OS perform illegal actions when you can do it yourself?

Re: DPMS

2000-09-18 Thread Simon Kongshoj
icitly in the XF86Config file to get DPMS. IIRC, you need a line called 'Option "DPMS"' in the Monitor section. -- Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cs.auc.dk/~simon Why have your OS perform illegal actions when you can do it yourself? -- To