On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:17:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> To improve the documentation, I need to understand how the existing
> documentation misled you. Otherwise this bug will go unresolved.
The documentation is fine; the variable is what i was bothered about.
That bug report is some
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:17:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> To improve the documentation, I need to understand how the existing
> documentation misled you. Otherwise this bug will go unresolved.
The documentation is fine; the variable is what i was bothered about.
That bug report is some
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:01:22 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am probably not going to act on your implicit request (to trash the
>allowed_users variable and functionality).
>
>The reason is that, as documented in Xwrapper.config(5), "allowed_users"
>doesn't
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:01:22 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am probably not going to act on your implicit request (to trash the
>allowed_users variable and functionality).
>
>The reason is that, as documented in Xwrapper.config(5), "allowed_users"
>doesn't
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-7
Severity: wishlist
So, i try to run XFree86 after a woody-to-sid dist-upgrade.
Instead of getting the usal X startup, though, I get a message like
"user is not allowed to run the X server".
After an strace, I find out there's a particular configuation
d
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-7
Severity: wishlist
So, i try to run XFree86 after a woody-to-sid dist-upgrade.
Instead of getting the usal X startup, though, I get a message like
"user is not allowed to run the X server".
After an strace, I find out there's a particular configuation
d
6 matches
Mail list logo
