On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:13:25PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > 2) If anyone has anything to regarding VME or Q40/Q60 machines.
>
> Q40/Q60 has PS/2 keyboard, so I guess it has a PS/2 mouse as well. Richard?
sorry for the late reply, was away for a long while.
Q40/Q60 uses serial mouse.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:50:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:46:31PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:26:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > What you need to grep for is "Macintosh" for mac hardware, "Amiga" for
> > > amiga, or
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:23:38AM -0700, Erik van Roode wrote:
> At 09:36 10/22/2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> >I beseech you to help debug and fix the XFree86 module loader on m68k.
>
> If I understand correctly the issue with 68040/68060 is cache coherency.
> When looking
> at the 68040 ma
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:23:38AM -0700, Erik van Roode wrote:
> At 09:36 10/22/2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> >I beseech you to help debug and fix the XFree86 module loader on m68k.
>
> If I understand correctly the issue with 68040/68060 is cache coherency.
> When looking
> at the 68040 ma
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:36:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Okay, for m68k I will make x-window-system core depend on
> xserver-xfree86-dbg instead of xserver-xfree86.
isn't xserver-xfree86-dbg compiled without optimisations? That
would be bad on slower m68k machines.
> I beseech you to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:36:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Okay, for m68k I will make x-window-system core depend on
> xserver-xfree86-dbg instead of xserver-xfree86.
isn't xserver-xfree86-dbg compiled without optimisations? That
would be bad on slower m68k machines.
> I beseech you to
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > I have tested the various releases on m68k, so far it seems
> > the module loading in the X server is still broken on the 68060.
> >
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > I have tested the various releases on m68k, so far it seems
> > the module loading in the X server is still broken on the 68060.
> >
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:10:54PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:50:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I can't believe he actually intends to keep it like this..
> >
> > I'm going to #define DEV_RANDOM /dev/random for Linux systems.
>
> That's bad, because tha
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:33:30PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> Can't we just use the routines from asm/pgalloc.h, but we need to
> determine the CPU type from user space.
no, those are privileged instructions on m68k.
Bye
Richard
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:33:30PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> Can't we just use the routines from asm/pgalloc.h, but we need to
> determine the CPU type from user space.
no, those are privileged instructions on m68k.
Bye
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:07AM +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
Hi,
> I'll dig up my patch to see if I can get it working again, but I remember it
> being a bit kludgy because we have no equivalent of ppc_flush_icache() on
> m68k. There is __cache_flush() in libgcc (or was it libc?) but its API is
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:07AM +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
Hi,
> I'll dig up my patch to see if I can get it working again, but I remember it
> being a bit kludgy because we have no equivalent of ppc_flush_icache() on
> m68k. There is __cache_flush() in libgcc (or was it libc?) but its API i
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> > debian-devel.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> > debian-devel
15 matches
Mail list logo
